Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 for excess availment of Input Tax Credit where the petitioner failed to establish that suppliers filed requisite GSTR-1 for March 2019 and where no procedural infirmity in the impugned demand order was demonstrated. The Court found undue delay in institution and numbering of the petition, noting it was presented on 07.08.2025 but numbered only on 13.10.2025, and observed the petition was filed on the last day for seeking condonation of delay in appeal. Dismissal was without prejudice to the petitioner's liberty to file an appeal within 15 days, with no pre-deposit required as the assessed tax had already been paid.
The HC dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 for excess availment of Input Tax Credit where the petitioner failed to establish that suppliers filed requisite GSTR-1 for March 2019 and where no procedural infirmity in the impugned demand order was demonstrated. The Court found undue delay in institution and numbering of the petition, noting it was presented on 07.08.2025 but numbered only on 13.10.2025, and observed the petition was filed on the last day for seeking condonation of delay in appeal. Dismissal was without prejudice to the petitioner's liberty to file an appeal within 15 days, with no pre-deposit required as the assessed tax had already been paid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
