Retrospective cancellation voided for jurisdictional defects; registration restored retrospectively and application for additional business place to b...
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the...
Appeal dismissed: petitioner denied ITC for electricity used in township maintenance as residential supply; Explanation 1(d) prospective under s.2(17), s.16(1)
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
The HC affirmed the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, holding that the petitioner is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) for electricity consumed in maintenance of its township because such supply is external/residential and not in the course or furtherance of business under s.2(17) read with s.16(1) of the CGST Act. The court further held that the amendment inserting Explanation 1(d) to Rule 43 is prospective and does not operate retrospectively; ITC cannot be claimed for exempt supplies of DCS made on or before 05.07.2022. The Single Judge's reasoning and findings were upheld in all respects.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
