Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
HC allowed the writ petition and quashed the show cause notice issued by the revenue officer, holding that levy of IGST on a service component is impermissible where IGST has already been concomitantly imposed on the goods component of a composite supply. The HC, following the SC precedent, concluded that a tax treated by legislation as part of the composite supply of goods cannot be separately taxed as a supply of service. Consequentially, declarations under the specified entries were held invalid to the extent they sought to impose IGST on the service element, and the impugned notice dated 15.12.2021 was set aside.
HC allowed the writ petition and quashed the show cause notice issued by the revenue officer, holding that levy of IGST on a service component is impermissible where IGST has already been concomitantly imposed on the goods component of a composite supply. The HC, following the SC precedent, concluded that a tax treated by legislation as part of the composite supply of goods cannot be separately taxed as a supply of service. Consequentially, declarations under the specified entries were held invalid to the extent they sought to impose IGST on the service element, and the impugned notice dated 15.12.2021 was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.