Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
HC allowed the writ petition and quashed the show cause notice issued by the revenue officer, holding that levy of IGST on a service component is impermissible where IGST has already been concomitantly imposed on the goods component of a composite supply. The HC, following the SC precedent, concluded that a tax treated by legislation as part of the composite supply of goods cannot be separately taxed as a supply of service. Consequentially, declarations under the specified entries were held invalid to the extent they sought to impose IGST on the service element, and the impugned notice dated 15.12.2021 was set aside.
HC allowed the writ petition and quashed the show cause notice issued by the revenue officer, holding that levy of IGST on a service component is impermissible where IGST has already been concomitantly imposed on the goods component of a composite supply. The HC, following the SC precedent, concluded that a tax treated by legislation as part of the composite supply of goods cannot be separately taxed as a supply of service. Consequentially, declarations under the specified entries were held invalid to the extent they sought to impose IGST on the service element, and the impugned notice dated 15.12.2021 was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.