Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
The HC quashed consolidated show-cause notices issued by Respondent No.2 that clubbed multiple financial years for demand of GST and reversal of alleged ineligible ITC, holding such consolidation to be without jurisdiction and a judicial overreach. The court reaffirmed the statutory limitation scheme under the CGST Act, 2017 - tax periods are tied to returns (monthly or annual) and demands must respect the time limits in Sections 73 and 74 - so SCNs must be framed with reference to discrete financial years. Prior observations by a coordinate bench were noted but the HC granted the petition and set aside the impugned consolidated notices.
The HC quashed consolidated show-cause notices issued by Respondent No.2 that clubbed multiple financial years for demand of GST and reversal of alleged ineligible ITC, holding such consolidation to be without jurisdiction and a judicial overreach. The court reaffirmed the statutory limitation scheme under the CGST Act, 2017 - tax periods are tied to returns (monthly or annual) and demands must respect the time limits in Sections 73 and 74 - so SCNs must be framed with reference to discrete financial years. Prior observations by a coordinate bench were noted but the HC granted the petition and set aside the impugned consolidated notices.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
