Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The HC held that the transactions constitute a composite supply under section 2(30) of the CGST Act, with the predominant element being a supply of services (photographic printing/processing) rather than transfer of goods; title to the digital images remains with the customers and the paper/ink are ancillary. Consequently, tax liability is determined by the principal supply (printing services) under section 8, and the proceedings against the anonymous petitioners were upheld and the petition dismissed. The Court declined to interfere with the impugned assessments, while noting that the petitioners remain free to pursue any available statutory remedies against tax assessments.
The HC held that the transactions constitute a composite supply under section 2(30) of the CGST Act, with the predominant element being a supply of services (photographic printing/processing) rather than transfer of goods; title to the digital images remains with the customers and the paper/ink are ancillary. Consequently, tax liability is determined by the principal supply (printing services) under section 8, and the proceedings against the anonymous petitioners were upheld and the petition dismissed. The Court declined to interfere with the impugned assessments, while noting that the petitioners remain free to pursue any available statutory remedies against tax assessments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
