Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the taxpayer's receipts for repair and maintenance of aircraft engines from Indian customers do not constitute Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under the India-Canada DTAA (and India-Singapore DTAA) because the Department failed to establish that technical knowledge, skills or know-how were transferred so as to "make available" technology to the recipient. The Tribunal found no enduring benefit or ability of the recipient to use the technology independently post-contract. Applying the same reasoning to all similar repair and maintenance receipts for the year, the ITAT concluded those receipts are not taxable as FTS in the taxpayer's hands.
The ITAT held that the taxpayer's receipts for repair and maintenance of aircraft engines from Indian customers do not constitute Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under the India-Canada DTAA (and India-Singapore DTAA) because the Department failed to establish that technical knowledge, skills or know-how were transferred so as to "make available" technology to the recipient. The Tribunal found no enduring benefit or ability of the recipient to use the technology independently post-contract. Applying the same reasoning to all similar repair and maintenance receipts for the year, the ITAT concluded those receipts are not taxable as FTS in the taxpayer's hands.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
