Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the transfer pricing upward adjustment by the AO, finding no infirmity in treating the deleted clause (i) of section 92BA as never having existed following its omission by the Finance Act, 2017, and thereby rejecting Revenue's grounds. The Tribunal agreed that the TPO's adoption of the internal CUP as MAM and the AO's reliance on the erstwhile provision did not sustain the addition. Further, ITAT deleted the penalty under section 271AA imposed for non-maintenance of records relating to specified domestic transactions. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the assessment adjustments and penalty were quashed.
ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the transfer pricing upward adjustment by the AO, finding no infirmity in treating the deleted clause (i) of section 92BA as never having existed following its omission by the Finance Act, 2017, and thereby rejecting Revenue's grounds. The Tribunal agreed that the TPO's adoption of the internal CUP as MAM and the AO's reliance on the erstwhile provision did not sustain the addition. Further, ITAT deleted the penalty under section 271AA imposed for non-maintenance of records relating to specified domestic transactions. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the assessment adjustments and penalty were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.