Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT upheld the Commissioner's rejection of the declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12 as based on reasonable doubt, ordered sequential re-determination under Valuation Rules 3-9 with reliance on the recovered invoice data, but set aside the Commissioner's addition under Valuation Rule 10(2) (freight/insurance) because the records did not prove FOB pricing and the imported values were to be treated as CIF. Section 138C certification was not requisite for reliance on the printed Excel material in these circumstances. The confirmed duties are to be recomputed accordingly; penalty under s.114A must be recalculated, while the s.114AA penalty (Rs.50,00,000) was sustained as not excessive. Appeal allowed in part.
CESTAT upheld the Commissioner's rejection of the declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12 as based on reasonable doubt, ordered sequential re-determination under Valuation Rules 3-9 with reliance on the recovered invoice data, but set aside the Commissioner's addition under Valuation Rule 10(2) (freight/insurance) because the records did not prove FOB pricing and the imported values were to be treated as CIF. Section 138C certification was not requisite for reliance on the printed Excel material in these circumstances. The confirmed duties are to be recomputed accordingly; penalty under s.114A must be recalculated, while the s.114AA penalty (Rs.50,00,000) was sustained as not excessive. Appeal allowed in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
