Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
AT upheld provisional attachment and dismissed the appeal, finding that appellant A's transfers to close relatives and cash investments could not be explained as legitimate savings and were largely derived from proceeds of crime connected to misappropriation of government funds. The Tribunal accepted respondents' computation that investments in healthcare infrastructure and capital subscriptions to M/s Pulse Sanjeevani Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. were financed predominantly by illicit funds, with bank loans insufficient to account for the outlays. Appellant P's unexplained cash deposits (≈Rs.73.81 lakhs), high-premium insurance payments and routing of cash through relatives (including B and C) evidenced money-laundering; seizure of cash corroborated involvement. No error found in the impugned order.
AT upheld provisional attachment and dismissed the appeal, finding that appellant A's transfers to close relatives and cash investments could not be explained as legitimate savings and were largely derived from proceeds of crime connected to misappropriation of government funds. The Tribunal accepted respondents' computation that investments in healthcare infrastructure and capital subscriptions to M/s Pulse Sanjeevani Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. were financed predominantly by illicit funds, with bank loans insufficient to account for the outlays. Appellant P's unexplained cash deposits (≈Rs.73.81 lakhs), high-premium insurance payments and routing of cash through relatives (including B and C) evidenced money-laundering; seizure of cash corroborated involvement. No error found in the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
