Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC directed that, since the appellate fact-finding by the ITAT attained finality and the petitioner paid the assessed arrears in accordance with the tribunal's order, no further recovery proceedings could be lawfully pursued and the existing attachment must be lifted. Relying on the mandate of s.225(2) of the IT Act, the court ordered the Tax Recovery Officer (TRO) to vacate the attachment dated 10.12.2021 and notify the concerned respondent within four weeks; the receiving respondent was ordered to remove encumbrances in the entry certificate forthwith upon receipt. The court emphasized that the Department remains free to seek recovery only if it succeeds in any subsequent appeal.
The HC directed that, since the appellate fact-finding by the ITAT attained finality and the petitioner paid the assessed arrears in accordance with the tribunal's order, no further recovery proceedings could be lawfully pursued and the existing attachment must be lifted. Relying on the mandate of s.225(2) of the IT Act, the court ordered the Tax Recovery Officer (TRO) to vacate the attachment dated 10.12.2021 and notify the concerned respondent within four weeks; the receiving respondent was ordered to remove encumbrances in the entry certificate forthwith upon receipt. The court emphasized that the Department remains free to seek recovery only if it succeeds in any subsequent appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
