Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
HC dismissed the petition challenging reopening of assessment...
Petition challenging reassessment under s.147 dismissed where no jurisdictional plea; courts defer to administrative belief unless arbitrary or mala fide
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
HC dismissed the petition challenging reopening of assessment under s.147, upholding the impugned order where no jurisdictional plea was advanced. The court held that review of the sufficiency or adequacy of the recorded reasons to believe is circumscribed by judicial restraint and the Wednesbury principle of reasonableness; courts do not act as appellate bodies to reassess administrative satisfaction absent arbitrariness or mala fides. The formation of opinion by tax authorities is administrative, requiring honest, bona fide information and a reasonable nexus to alleged non-production of documents; extraneous material vitiates the belief. In consequence, the petition was dismissed and the reassessment proceedings remain valid.
HC dismissed the petition challenging reopening of assessment under s.147, upholding the impugned order where no jurisdictional plea was advanced. The court held that review of the sufficiency or adequacy of the recorded reasons to believe is circumscribed by judicial restraint and the Wednesbury principle of reasonableness; courts do not act as appellate bodies to reassess administrative satisfaction absent arbitrariness or mala fides. The formation of opinion by tax authorities is administrative, requiring honest, bona fide information and a reasonable nexus to alleged non-production of documents; extraneous material vitiates the belief. In consequence, the petition was dismissed and the reassessment proceedings remain valid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
