Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT affirms that the Appellant company committed contraventions of FEMA/regulatory provisions relating to foreign inward remittances, reporting and FLA filing obligations and timing of share issue; mens rea, bona fides or absence of quantifiable foreign exchange loss do not absolve liability under FEMA, which is compliance-oriented and penalizes the sum involved in the contravention. The Tribunal rejects delay/limitation objections and concurs with the Respondent that the quantum of the "sum involved" was correctly quantified. In view of the nature and continuity of the contraventions, however, the AT directs the adjudicating authority to substantially reduce the monetary penalty imposed on the company while upholding liability.
The AT affirms that the Appellant company committed contraventions of FEMA/regulatory provisions relating to foreign inward remittances, reporting and FLA filing obligations and timing of share issue; mens rea, bona fides or absence of quantifiable foreign exchange loss do not absolve liability under FEMA, which is compliance-oriented and penalizes the sum involved in the contravention. The Tribunal rejects delay/limitation objections and concurs with the Respondent that the quantum of the "sum involved" was correctly quantified. In view of the nature and continuity of the contraventions, however, the AT directs the adjudicating authority to substantially reduce the monetary penalty imposed on the company while upholding liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.