Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC allowed the challenge to the rectification order in part and set aside the impugned demand insofar as it was computed on total turnover without reasoning; it held the Adjudicating Authority erred by imposing GST on aggregate turnover of combo packs despite available delineation of B2B and B2C sales. The Court found breach of natural justice and procedural infirmity in levying differential tax and multiple penalties. The petitioner was directed to seek the statutory appellate remedy, with any pre-deposit to be calculated and paid only in respect of amounts attributable separately to B2B and B2C sales for each financial year. Petition disposed.
The HC allowed the challenge to the rectification order in part and set aside the impugned demand insofar as it was computed on total turnover without reasoning; it held the Adjudicating Authority erred by imposing GST on aggregate turnover of combo packs despite available delineation of B2B and B2C sales. The Court found breach of natural justice and procedural infirmity in levying differential tax and multiple penalties. The petitioner was directed to seek the statutory appellate remedy, with any pre-deposit to be calculated and paid only in respect of amounts attributable separately to B2B and B2C sales for each financial year. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.