Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The HC set aside the cancellation order dated 17.6.2023 and directed respondents to revive the petitioner's GST registration to its original status and number, subject to payment of the entire tax liability for the relevant period together with interest, late fee and penalty, to be deposited by 15.11.2025 via a portal respondents shall provide. The court held the petitioner was in default, did not seek revocation under s.30 or file an appeal under s.107 within prescribed time, and that the appellate authority lacks jurisdiction to condone delay beyond the statutory outer limit (three months plus one month). Petition dismissed as disposed after issuing the revival direction conditional on payment.
The HC set aside the cancellation order dated 17.6.2023 and directed respondents to revive the petitioner's GST registration to its original status and number, subject to payment of the entire tax liability for the relevant period together with interest, late fee and penalty, to be deposited by 15.11.2025 via a portal respondents shall provide. The court held the petitioner was in default, did not seek revocation under s.30 or file an appeal under s.107 within prescribed time, and that the appellate authority lacks jurisdiction to condone delay beyond the statutory outer limit (three months plus one month). Petition dismissed as disposed after issuing the revival direction conditional on payment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
