Revenue authority mandates using scheme-specific reversal procedures, not revising original entries, for instrument-based trade/customs benefits effec...
Transaction value under s.15(1) governs unrelated sales; valuation between related parties per Rule 28; consignment note required for unregistered rec...
HC dismissed the writ petition as misconceived and premature, declining to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction where statutory authorities remain seised of ongoing investigation into transactions between the petitioner and the named suppliers. The court refused to make factual findings or to issue a mandamus directing unblocking of the electronic credit ledger, noting the blocking is confined to specified ITC claims and that no prejudice to the petitioner during the DGGI investigation was demonstrated. Absent final adjudication by the competent authority, the HC refused to usurp fact-finding functions and dismissed the petition without ordering restoration of the blocked input tax credit.
HC dismissed the writ petition as misconceived and premature, declining to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction where statutory authorities remain seised of ongoing investigation into transactions between the petitioner and the named suppliers. The court refused to make factual findings or to issue a mandamus directing unblocking of the electronic credit ledger, noting the blocking is confined to specified ITC claims and that no prejudice to the petitioner during the DGGI investigation was demonstrated. Absent final adjudication by the competent authority, the HC refused to usurp fact-finding functions and dismissed the petition without ordering restoration of the blocked input tax credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
