Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition as misconceived and premature, declining to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction where statutory authorities remain seised of ongoing investigation into transactions between the petitioner and the named suppliers. The court refused to make factual findings or to issue a mandamus directing unblocking of the electronic credit ledger, noting the blocking is confined to specified ITC claims and that no prejudice to the petitioner during the DGGI investigation was demonstrated. Absent final adjudication by the competent authority, the HC refused to usurp fact-finding functions and dismissed the petition without ordering restoration of the blocked input tax credit.
HC dismissed the writ petition as misconceived and premature, declining to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction where statutory authorities remain seised of ongoing investigation into transactions between the petitioner and the named suppliers. The court refused to make factual findings or to issue a mandamus directing unblocking of the electronic credit ledger, noting the blocking is confined to specified ITC claims and that no prejudice to the petitioner during the DGGI investigation was demonstrated. Absent final adjudication by the competent authority, the HC refused to usurp fact-finding functions and dismissed the petition without ordering restoration of the blocked input tax credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.