The accused denied bail over alleged GST credential misuse to commit Rs.1,09,11,404 fraud involving multiple proprietorships; investigation to continu...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9701 to 9720 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC found that the SCN was served on the authorized registered email beyond the prescribed period under s.73(2) read with s.73(10) CGST Act and that the adjudicating authority failed to consider the majority of the Petitioner's submissions and disregarded relevant precedent, thereby breaching principles of natural justice. The Court noted the Department knew the authorized email had changed and that service on the new address occurred after the limitation period, rendering the SCN prima facie time-barred. The Petitioner established a strong prima facie case for interim relief; the operation of the impugned order was stayed pending admission, and the matter was adjourned to 20 Nov 2025.
The HC found that the SCN was served on the authorized registered email beyond the prescribed period under s.73(2) read with s.73(10) CGST Act and that the adjudicating authority failed to consider the majority of the Petitioner's submissions and disregarded relevant precedent, thereby breaching principles of natural justice. The Court noted the Department knew the authorized email had changed and that service on the new address occurred after the limitation period, rendering the SCN prima facie time-barred. The Petitioner established a strong prima facie case for interim relief; the operation of the impugned order was stayed pending admission, and the matter was adjourned to 20 Nov 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
