Revenue authority mandates using scheme-specific reversal procedures, not revising original entries, for instrument-based trade/customs benefits effec...
Transaction value under s.15(1) governs unrelated sales; valuation between related parties per Rule 28; consignment note required for unregistered rec...
The HC found that the SCN was served on the authorized registered email beyond the prescribed period under s.73(2) read with s.73(10) CGST Act and that the adjudicating authority failed to consider the majority of the Petitioner's submissions and disregarded relevant precedent, thereby breaching principles of natural justice. The Court noted the Department knew the authorized email had changed and that service on the new address occurred after the limitation period, rendering the SCN prima facie time-barred. The Petitioner established a strong prima facie case for interim relief; the operation of the impugned order was stayed pending admission, and the matter was adjourned to 20 Nov 2025.
The HC found that the SCN was served on the authorized registered email beyond the prescribed period under s.73(2) read with s.73(10) CGST Act and that the adjudicating authority failed to consider the majority of the Petitioner's submissions and disregarded relevant precedent, thereby breaching principles of natural justice. The Court noted the Department knew the authorized email had changed and that service on the new address occurred after the limitation period, rendering the SCN prima facie time-barred. The Petitioner established a strong prima facie case for interim relief; the operation of the impugned order was stayed pending admission, and the matter was adjourned to 20 Nov 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
