Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAR held that the applicant, constituted and performing statutory pollution-control functions, qualifies as a "Governmental Authority/Local Authority" under the GST statutory scheme and notification framework, and that its licensing/consent/registration fees relate to functions akin to those entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W of the Constitution (eg, environmental protection, sanitation, solid waste management). Consequently, such services fall within the exemption under the relevant GST notification for services provided by a Governmental/Local Authority in relation to municipal functions. The result: amounts collected by the applicant for grant of licences/consents/registrations are not leviable to GST and no tax liability arises on those receipts.
AAR held that the applicant, constituted and performing statutory pollution-control functions, qualifies as a "Governmental Authority/Local Authority" under the GST statutory scheme and notification framework, and that its licensing/consent/registration fees relate to functions akin to those entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W of the Constitution (eg, environmental protection, sanitation, solid waste management). Consequently, such services fall within the exemption under the relevant GST notification for services provided by a Governmental/Local Authority in relation to municipal functions. The result: amounts collected by the applicant for grant of licences/consents/registrations are not leviable to GST and no tax liability arises on those receipts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.