Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the Revenue's challenge and held that payments made to non-resident entities for the sale of copyrighted software do not constitute "royalty" taxable in India under the Act or under the applicable DTAA. Applying the End User Licence Agreement and precedent of the Supreme Court, the HC found the Tribunal's conclusion (that the receipts were not royalty) sustainable and not perverse; moreover, holdings in related payer-side decisions bind the characterization in the hands of the payee. Consequently, income arising from the sale of the copyrighted software by the non-resident respondent-assessee is not taxable in India as royalty and TDS under section 195 is not attracted.
The HC dismissed the Revenue's challenge and held that payments made to non-resident entities for the sale of copyrighted software do not constitute "royalty" taxable in India under the Act or under the applicable DTAA. Applying the End User Licence Agreement and precedent of the Supreme Court, the HC found the Tribunal's conclusion (that the receipts were not royalty) sustainable and not perverse; moreover, holdings in related payer-side decisions bind the characterization in the hands of the payee. Consequently, income arising from the sale of the copyrighted software by the non-resident respondent-assessee is not taxable in India as royalty and TDS under section 195 is not attracted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.