Authority rules B+G+31 service apartment is commercial building construction, not multi-storey residential for tax classification under RERA definitio...
Resale price method upheld for distribution; assessee's margins accepted and certain transfer-pricing adjustments deleted due to documented reimbursem...
ITAT held that the payments in question do not constitute deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) because the recipient was not a registered shareholder of the assessee-company; consequently, tax deduction at source under section 194 could not be fastened, and consequential liability under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) does not arise. Characterising the transaction as commercial lending, the Tribunal concluded that neither the deemed dividend provisions nor tax-deduction liabilities apply. The assessee's appeal was allowed and the demand under the said provisions was set aside.
ITAT held that the payments in question do not constitute deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) because the recipient was not a registered shareholder of the assessee-company; consequently, tax deduction at source under section 194 could not be fastened, and consequential liability under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) does not arise. Characterising the transaction as commercial lending, the Tribunal concluded that neither the deemed dividend provisions nor tax-deduction liabilities apply. The assessee's appeal was allowed and the demand under the said provisions was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
