Authority rules B+G+31 service apartment is commercial building construction, not multi-storey residential for tax classification under RERA definitio...
Resale price method upheld for distribution; assessee's margins accepted and certain transfer-pricing adjustments deleted due to documented reimbursem...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9821 to 9840 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT held that the Revenue's absolute confiscation and ex parte disposal of seized gold while the matter was sub judice constituted a breach of natural justice; the adjudicating authority's order was set aside and the appeal allowed. The Tribunal directed refund to the Appellant of the value differential of the disposed gold with statutory interest from the date of disposal, subject to deduction of the redemption fine imposed by the revisional order, such fine being properly deductible where the Appellant seeks return of the gold or its market value. The Revenue's failure to inform the Appellant and to seek appellate permission rendered its disposal action unlawful.
CESTAT held that the Revenue's absolute confiscation and ex parte disposal of seized gold while the matter was sub judice constituted a breach of natural justice; the adjudicating authority's order was set aside and the appeal allowed. The Tribunal directed refund to the Appellant of the value differential of the disposed gold with statutory interest from the date of disposal, subject to deduction of the redemption fine imposed by the revisional order, such fine being properly deductible where the Appellant seeks return of the gold or its market value. The Revenue's failure to inform the Appellant and to seek appellate permission rendered its disposal action unlawful.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
