Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The CESTAT remitted the dispute to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication in light of conflicting high court pronouncements on the vires of the HCCAR, 2009 and pending SLP before the apex court; the Tribunal treated the Telangana HC view as binding in the absence of an apex stay but directed reconsideration after the SLP outcome. The Tribunal set aside the recovery of interest under s.28AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on CRCs, holding s.28AA inapplicable because CRCs are not "duty" within s.28. The matter of exemption under Board Circular No.02/2021-Cus was remanded to the Commissioner to obtain DGHRD clarification and decide accordingly. Appeal disposed.
The CESTAT remitted the dispute to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication in light of conflicting high court pronouncements on the vires of the HCCAR, 2009 and pending SLP before the apex court; the Tribunal treated the Telangana HC view as binding in the absence of an apex stay but directed reconsideration after the SLP outcome. The Tribunal set aside the recovery of interest under s.28AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on CRCs, holding s.28AA inapplicable because CRCs are not "duty" within s.28. The matter of exemption under Board Circular No.02/2021-Cus was remanded to the Commissioner to obtain DGHRD clarification and decide accordingly. Appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
