Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order of the adjudicating authority which had rejected the appellant's Section 9 IBC application without recording reasons, hearing submissions, or issuing notice to the respondent. The matter is remanded for fresh adjudication, directing the adjudicating authority to afford both parties opportunity to be heard, record submissions and furnish reasoned findings. All issues are kept open for fresh consideration. The tribunal clarified that its remand does not express any view on the merits and the adjudicating authority's final decision must be uninfluenced by the appellate observations.
NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order of the adjudicating authority which had rejected the appellant's Section 9 IBC application without recording reasons, hearing submissions, or issuing notice to the respondent. The matter is remanded for fresh adjudication, directing the adjudicating authority to afford both parties opportunity to be heard, record submissions and furnish reasoned findings. All issues are kept open for fresh consideration. The tribunal clarified that its remand does not express any view on the merits and the adjudicating authority's final decision must be uninfluenced by the appellate observations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
