Reassessment under s.148A held valid; s.69 additions totaling Rs.7,00,000 deleted after acceptable contemporaneous explanations for property investmen...
Adjudication set aside; Rule 9 valuation based on internet engineer report quashed for Rule 3(4) non-compliance; Section 138B cross-examination requir...
The CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders. It held that the appellant's delivery of courses under a recognized university leading to BCA/DCA/PGDCA constituted educational services exempt from service tax under the relevant notification; grants-in-aid received for centrally sponsored training were non-taxable; employer provident fund contributions could not be included in the gross value for manpower supply services; and demands framed as "Business Auxiliary/Business Support Service" were unsustainable where the SCN/adjudication failed to specify applicable sub-clauses. Further, invocation of the extended period of limitation was not maintainable on the facts. The appeals were allowed.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders. It held that the appellant's delivery of courses under a recognized university leading to BCA/DCA/PGDCA constituted educational services exempt from service tax under the relevant notification; grants-in-aid received for centrally sponsored training were non-taxable; employer provident fund contributions could not be included in the gross value for manpower supply services; and demands framed as "Business Auxiliary/Business Support Service" were unsustainable where the SCN/adjudication failed to specify applicable sub-clauses. Further, invocation of the extended period of limitation was not maintainable on the facts. The appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
