Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders. It held that the appellant's delivery of courses under a recognized university leading to BCA/DCA/PGDCA constituted educational services exempt from service tax under the relevant notification; grants-in-aid received for centrally sponsored training were non-taxable; employer provident fund contributions could not be included in the gross value for manpower supply services; and demands framed as "Business Auxiliary/Business Support Service" were unsustainable where the SCN/adjudication failed to specify applicable sub-clauses. Further, invocation of the extended period of limitation was not maintainable on the facts. The appeals were allowed.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders. It held that the appellant's delivery of courses under a recognized university leading to BCA/DCA/PGDCA constituted educational services exempt from service tax under the relevant notification; grants-in-aid received for centrally sponsored training were non-taxable; employer provident fund contributions could not be included in the gross value for manpower supply services; and demands framed as "Business Auxiliary/Business Support Service" were unsustainable where the SCN/adjudication failed to specify applicable sub-clauses. Further, invocation of the extended period of limitation was not maintainable on the facts. The appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
