Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner company, holding that appeals under Section 107 of the Act are subject to the statutory limitation (four months under ss.107(1) and (4)) and that the delay in filing could not be condoned. The court relied on prior co-ordinate bench precedent affirming strict adherence to the limitation period. Findings of no breach of natural justice were recorded, as the petitioner had participated in the proceedings and received the Order-in-Original. The petitioner's reliance on the alleged illegibility of the order was rejected as a procedural remedy available to the petitioner which was not availed. Petition accordingly dismissed and matters disposed.
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner company, holding that appeals under Section 107 of the Act are subject to the statutory limitation (four months under ss.107(1) and (4)) and that the delay in filing could not be condoned. The court relied on prior co-ordinate bench precedent affirming strict adherence to the limitation period. Findings of no breach of natural justice were recorded, as the petitioner had participated in the proceedings and received the Order-in-Original. The petitioner's reliance on the alleged illegibility of the order was rejected as a procedural remedy available to the petitioner which was not availed. Petition accordingly dismissed and matters disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
