Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AAR held that, on the presented facts and documentary evidence (FSSAI licence, trademark certificate and test report), the applicant's refined rice bran oil is of edible grade and, notwithstanding its marketing as lamp oil, classification must be governed by the product's composition rather than asserted end-use absent explicit tariff provision. Consequently, the oil, when supplied without additives or admixture of other oils, is classifiable under Tariff Heading 1515 90 40 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The ruling denies reclassification based on commercial description and concludes that Sl. No. 87 of Schedule I to Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) is not applicable to alter this classification.
The AAR held that, on the presented facts and documentary evidence (FSSAI licence, trademark certificate and test report), the applicant's refined rice bran oil is of edible grade and, notwithstanding its marketing as lamp oil, classification must be governed by the product's composition rather than asserted end-use absent explicit tariff provision. Consequently, the oil, when supplied without additives or admixture of other oils, is classifiable under Tariff Heading 1515 90 40 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The ruling denies reclassification based on commercial description and concludes that Sl. No. 87 of Schedule I to Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) is not applicable to alter this classification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
