Appeal allows marketing payments as deductible business expenses under Sec.37; director pay retained; R&D deductible from certificate date under Sec.3...
Registration under s.12AB upheld; CIT(Exemptions) exceeded jurisdiction by deciding taxability instead of preliminary verification and registration di...
Dependent Agent PE unresolved for lack of factual inquiry; arm's-length distribution accepted; royalty claim rejected; 15% refund interest (Section 24...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9881 to 9900 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT affirmed the adjudication that imported CNG kits/components qualified as packaged goods within the scope of Section 4A read with the SWM Act and Rules, requiring declaration of Retail Sale Price (RSP); consequent customs duty shortfall based on non-declaration of RSP was upheld and recovery directed for the normal assessment period. The penalty under Section 114A was quashed. Personal liability under Section 112 was sustained against the director for failure to declare RSP, but personal penalties against the officer-in-charge and the CHA were set aside. The impugned order was otherwise affirmed and the appeal disposed of accordingly.
CESTAT affirmed the adjudication that imported CNG kits/components qualified as packaged goods within the scope of Section 4A read with the SWM Act and Rules, requiring declaration of Retail Sale Price (RSP); consequent customs duty shortfall based on non-declaration of RSP was upheld and recovery directed for the normal assessment period. The penalty under Section 114A was quashed. Personal liability under Section 112 was sustained against the director for failure to declare RSP, but personal penalties against the officer-in-charge and the CHA were set aside. The impugned order was otherwise affirmed and the appeal disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.