Authority rules B+G+31 service apartment is commercial building construction, not multi-storey residential for tax classification under RERA definitio...
Resale price method upheld for distribution; assessee's margins accepted and certain transfer-pricing adjustments deleted due to documented reimbursem...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9821 to 9840 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the respondent's rejection of the petitioner's Form No.1 declaration under the DTVSV Scheme, 2024, holding that mandation to file the appeal online under Rule 45 did not render the manually filed appeal invalid; the appeal is to be treated as pending on the specified cut-off date for eligibility and calculation of disputed tax in terms of the Scheme. The court found the respondent unjustified in denying scheme relief and directed the respondent to process the petitioner's declaration under the DTVSV Scheme, 2024. Parties are anonymized; relief is declaratory and procedural, compelling administrative compliance with the Scheme.
The HC set aside the respondent's rejection of the petitioner's Form No.1 declaration under the DTVSV Scheme, 2024, holding that mandation to file the appeal online under Rule 45 did not render the manually filed appeal invalid; the appeal is to be treated as pending on the specified cut-off date for eligibility and calculation of disputed tax in terms of the Scheme. The court found the respondent unjustified in denying scheme relief and directed the respondent to process the petitioner's declaration under the DTVSV Scheme, 2024. Parties are anonymized; relief is declaratory and procedural, compelling administrative compliance with the Scheme.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
