Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s acceptance of the assessee's use of TNMM as the most appropriate MAM for benchmarking exports to AEs, noting consistency with prior appellate orders and inability of the Departmental Representative to show infirmity. The CIT(A)'s deletion of additions under s.40(a)(ia) for alleged TDS defaults was sustained on evidence of reversal of year-end provisions and subsequent booking of expenses. Deletions relating to ICDS adjustments, reversal of liquidated damages, project provisions and doubtful debts were likewise upheld on factual findings and documentary disclosures which the Revenue failed to controvert.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s acceptance of the assessee's use of TNMM as the most appropriate MAM for benchmarking exports to AEs, noting consistency with prior appellate orders and inability of the Departmental Representative to show infirmity. The CIT(A)'s deletion of additions under s.40(a)(ia) for alleged TDS defaults was sustained on evidence of reversal of year-end provisions and subsequent booking of expenses. Deletions relating to ICDS adjustments, reversal of liquidated damages, project provisions and doubtful debts were likewise upheld on factual findings and documentary disclosures which the Revenue failed to controvert.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.