Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT quashed penalty under s.271B for failure to furnish an audit report under s.44AB, holding that the firm ceased to exist for the relevant assessment year and therefore no assessment or ancillary penalty proceedings could lawfully be initiated against the assessee. The Tribunal relied on a coordinate-bench decision in the assessee's own case for the relevant year, which concluded the firm's non-existence rendered subsequent assessment additions and penalties void ab initio. Consequently, the AO's penalty imposition under s.271B was declared null and void and set aside, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.
The ITAT quashed penalty under s.271B for failure to furnish an audit report under s.44AB, holding that the firm ceased to exist for the relevant assessment year and therefore no assessment or ancillary penalty proceedings could lawfully be initiated against the assessee. The Tribunal relied on a coordinate-bench decision in the assessee's own case for the relevant year, which concluded the firm's non-existence rendered subsequent assessment additions and penalties void ab initio. Consequently, the AO's penalty imposition under s.271B was declared null and void and set aside, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.