Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The HC upheld that the assessee's challenge to the territorial jurisdiction of the AO was barred by Section 124(3)(a) of the IT Act because no objection was raised within the statutory period or prior to completion of assessment; notice under s.143(2) served on the PAN address did not revive the objection. The court further held that subsequent administrative reallocation of wards lawfully vested jurisdiction in ITO, Ward-2(1), Raipur, rendering the jurisdictional plea untimely and without merit. Consequently, the ITAT's refusal to entertain the jurisdictional challenge was affirmed and the substantial question of law was answered against the assessee.
The HC upheld that the assessee's challenge to the territorial jurisdiction of the AO was barred by Section 124(3)(a) of the IT Act because no objection was raised within the statutory period or prior to completion of assessment; notice under s.143(2) served on the PAN address did not revive the objection. The court further held that subsequent administrative reallocation of wards lawfully vested jurisdiction in ITO, Ward-2(1), Raipur, rendering the jurisdictional plea untimely and without merit. Consequently, the ITAT's refusal to entertain the jurisdictional challenge was affirmed and the substantial question of law was answered against the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.