Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and set aside the assessing officer's rejection of books and deemed income estimate of 2% of sales, holding that the assessee operated as a pass-through processor with negligible control and thin purchase-commission margins. The Tribunal found the assessee regularly declared gross profit of c.0.29% and noted the AO ought to have examined the buyer group by issuing notice under s.133(6). Having regard to comparable precedents and the assessee's scale vis-Ã -vis large group operations, the ITAT fixed estimated profit at 0.40% of gross sales and directed consequential relief, thereby allowing the appeal.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and set aside the assessing officer's rejection of books and deemed income estimate of 2% of sales, holding that the assessee operated as a pass-through processor with negligible control and thin purchase-commission margins. The Tribunal found the assessee regularly declared gross profit of c.0.29% and noted the AO ought to have examined the buyer group by issuing notice under s.133(6). Having regard to comparable precedents and the assessee's scale vis-Ã -vis large group operations, the ITAT fixed estimated profit at 0.40% of gross sales and directed consequential relief, thereby allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
