Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order and restored the case to the file of the AO/TPO for de novo adjudication, holding that neither the assessee's nor the TPO's CUP comparables met Rule 10B(2)/(3) comparability standards; the AO/TPO is directed to reassess ALP after identifying or constructing reliable comparables and making appropriate adjustments (including for convertibility/option value, subordination, security, industry risk and coupon structure). The Tribunal also remitted disputed legal/professional, advertising and commission expenses to the AO for verification and determination as capitalisable WIP or allowable revenue expenditure. The Revenue's appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order and restored the case to the file of the AO/TPO for de novo adjudication, holding that neither the assessee's nor the TPO's CUP comparables met Rule 10B(2)/(3) comparability standards; the AO/TPO is directed to reassess ALP after identifying or constructing reliable comparables and making appropriate adjustments (including for convertibility/option value, subordination, security, industry risk and coupon structure). The Tribunal also remitted disputed legal/professional, advertising and commission expenses to the AO for verification and determination as capitalisable WIP or allowable revenue expenditure. The Revenue's appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
