Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the notional foreign exchange gain arising on conversion of a Euro loan to a foreign subsidiary as at the balance-sheet date is capital and notional, and therefore not taxable income; the Assessing Officer's addition under ICDS VI was deleted and the CIT(A)'s order upheld. Expenditure incurred to obtain USFDA approval for clinical trials, including costs of supplying both bare and drug-eluting stents, was held to be wholly and exclusively for business under s.37(1) and allowed. The AO's reliance on a lesser notice period under s.148A(b) was found inapplicable on the facts; revenue's appeal dismissed.
ITAT held that the notional foreign exchange gain arising on conversion of a Euro loan to a foreign subsidiary as at the balance-sheet date is capital and notional, and therefore not taxable income; the Assessing Officer's addition under ICDS VI was deleted and the CIT(A)'s order upheld. Expenditure incurred to obtain USFDA approval for clinical trials, including costs of supplying both bare and drug-eluting stents, was held to be wholly and exclusively for business under s.37(1) and allowed. The AO's reliance on a lesser notice period under s.148A(b) was found inapplicable on the facts; revenue's appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
