Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the notional foreign exchange gain arising on conversion of a Euro loan to a foreign subsidiary as at the balance-sheet date is capital and notional, and therefore not taxable income; the Assessing Officer's addition under ICDS VI was deleted and the CIT(A)'s order upheld. Expenditure incurred to obtain USFDA approval for clinical trials, including costs of supplying both bare and drug-eluting stents, was held to be wholly and exclusively for business under s.37(1) and allowed. The AO's reliance on a lesser notice period under s.148A(b) was found inapplicable on the facts; revenue's appeal dismissed.
ITAT held that the notional foreign exchange gain arising on conversion of a Euro loan to a foreign subsidiary as at the balance-sheet date is capital and notional, and therefore not taxable income; the Assessing Officer's addition under ICDS VI was deleted and the CIT(A)'s order upheld. Expenditure incurred to obtain USFDA approval for clinical trials, including costs of supplying both bare and drug-eluting stents, was held to be wholly and exclusively for business under s.37(1) and allowed. The AO's reliance on a lesser notice period under s.148A(b) was found inapplicable on the facts; revenue's appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.