Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT remanded certain TP issues to the AO/TPO: additional evidence submitted by the assessee must be verified and the TPO shall determine benefit and compute ALP adopting TNMM in accordance with s.92C and Rules 10B/10C, affording the assessee hearing. The TPO exceeded jurisdiction by itemising assets in a slump sale and applying s.50C; the Tribunal directed acceptance of DCF valuation and the Form 3CEA fair value under s.50B. Selection of specified comparables for IPS division was upheld. Reimbursements by the assessee to its AE are cost-to-cost with no separate mark-up. Disallowance of provisions for contract losses was sustained; reversal is partly allowed subject to AO's verification of creation year and linkage to the disallowed provision.
ITAT remanded certain TP issues to the AO/TPO: additional evidence submitted by the assessee must be verified and the TPO shall determine benefit and compute ALP adopting TNMM in accordance with s.92C and Rules 10B/10C, affording the assessee hearing. The TPO exceeded jurisdiction by itemising assets in a slump sale and applying s.50C; the Tribunal directed acceptance of DCF valuation and the Form 3CEA fair value under s.50B. Selection of specified comparables for IPS division was upheld. Reimbursements by the assessee to its AE are cost-to-cost with no separate mark-up. Disallowance of provisions for contract losses was sustained; reversal is partly allowed subject to AO's verification of creation year and linkage to the disallowed provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
