Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order directing the Appellant to deliver the title deeds to the Liquidator. The Tribunal held the Appellant lacked any sustainable proprietary or equitable-mortgage rights because the material Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deed (MoDT) dated 30.12.2020 was unregistered and therefore inadmissible and ineffective under Section 17 read with the State amendment and barred from evidence by Section 49 of the Registration Act; the registered Agreement for Sale alone did not confer an enforceable right in the absence of specific-performance proceedings and the Appellant's failure to lodge a claim with the Liquidator.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order directing the Appellant to deliver the title deeds to the Liquidator. The Tribunal held the Appellant lacked any sustainable proprietary or equitable-mortgage rights because the material Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deed (MoDT) dated 30.12.2020 was unregistered and therefore inadmissible and ineffective under Section 17 read with the State amendment and barred from evidence by Section 49 of the Registration Act; the registered Agreement for Sale alone did not confer an enforceable right in the absence of specific-performance proceedings and the Appellant's failure to lodge a claim with the Liquidator.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.