Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order directing the Appellant to deliver the title deeds to the Liquidator. The Tribunal held the Appellant lacked any sustainable proprietary or equitable-mortgage rights because the material Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deed (MoDT) dated 30.12.2020 was unregistered and therefore inadmissible and ineffective under Section 17 read with the State amendment and barred from evidence by Section 49 of the Registration Act; the registered Agreement for Sale alone did not confer an enforceable right in the absence of specific-performance proceedings and the Appellant's failure to lodge a claim with the Liquidator.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order directing the Appellant to deliver the title deeds to the Liquidator. The Tribunal held the Appellant lacked any sustainable proprietary or equitable-mortgage rights because the material Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deed (MoDT) dated 30.12.2020 was unregistered and therefore inadmissible and ineffective under Section 17 read with the State amendment and barred from evidence by Section 49 of the Registration Act; the registered Agreement for Sale alone did not confer an enforceable right in the absence of specific-performance proceedings and the Appellant's failure to lodge a claim with the Liquidator.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
