Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding the impugned orders...
Appeal allowed: conversion treated as manufacture, entitlement under Notification No.56/2002-CE and CENVAT credits reinstated, including returned and remade goods
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding the impugned orders unsustainable and answering all issues in favour of the appellants. The Tribunal found the conversion processes amounted to manufacture for purposes of the Central Excise Tariff and upheld the appellants' entitlement to benefit under Notification No.56/2002-CE and to claim CENVAT credit, including on goods returned, remade and cleared on payment of duty. Revenue was held precluded from reopening past periods after having accepted contrary appellate orders and coordinate decisions; recovery as an "erroneous refund" could not be initiated absent challenge to the original assessment/self-assessment under the statutory appeal provisions. Consequently, demands and denials were set aside and the appeal allowed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding the impugned orders unsustainable and answering all issues in favour of the appellants. The Tribunal found the conversion processes amounted to manufacture for purposes of the Central Excise Tariff and upheld the appellants' entitlement to benefit under Notification No.56/2002-CE and to claim CENVAT credit, including on goods returned, remade and cleared on payment of duty. Revenue was held precluded from reopening past periods after having accepted contrary appellate orders and coordinate decisions; recovery as an "erroneous refund" could not be initiated absent challenge to the original assessment/self-assessment under the statutory appeal provisions. Consequently, demands and denials were set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.