Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held the writ petition maintainable: an unregistered partnership firm that is registered under the CGST Act and pays taxes may enforce statutory rights by writ, and inclusion of an individual partner as a party renders the petition maintainable despite the embargo in s.69 of the Partnership Act. The petition was disposed. The court directed that the petitioner may file an appeal by 30 November 2025 with the requisite pre-deposit of the tax amount; if filed by that date, the appeal shall not be dismissed on limitation grounds and will be adjudicated on merits.
The HC held the writ petition maintainable: an unregistered partnership firm that is registered under the CGST Act and pays taxes may enforce statutory rights by writ, and inclusion of an individual partner as a party renders the petition maintainable despite the embargo in s.69 of the Partnership Act. The petition was disposed. The court directed that the petitioner may file an appeal by 30 November 2025 with the requisite pre-deposit of the tax amount; if filed by that date, the appeal shall not be dismissed on limitation grounds and will be adjudicated on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.