Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC granted regular bail to the Applicant, observing that he was arrested from his residence without prior service of summons or notice under s.41A CrPC or s.35 BNSS, and that the investigation against him is complete with the complaint already filed. The court applied established Apex Court principles for offences under s.132(1)(c),(f),(h) CGST Act, noting limited statutory maximum sentence, documentary nature of evidence, absence of criminal antecedents, custody since 04.06.2025, and negligible risk of tampering or witness influence. No extraordinary circumstances justified continued detention. Bail was allowed subject to compliance with the conditions imposed by the HC.
HC granted regular bail to the Applicant, observing that he was arrested from his residence without prior service of summons or notice under s.41A CrPC or s.35 BNSS, and that the investigation against him is complete with the complaint already filed. The court applied established Apex Court principles for offences under s.132(1)(c),(f),(h) CGST Act, noting limited statutory maximum sentence, documentary nature of evidence, absence of criminal antecedents, custody since 04.06.2025, and negligible risk of tampering or witness influence. No extraordinary circumstances justified continued detention. Bail was allowed subject to compliance with the conditions imposed by the HC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
