Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
HC granted regular bail to the Applicant, observing that he was arrested from his residence without prior service of summons or notice under s.41A CrPC or s.35 BNSS, and that the investigation against him is complete with the complaint already filed. The court applied established Apex Court principles for offences under s.132(1)(c),(f),(h) CGST Act, noting limited statutory maximum sentence, documentary nature of evidence, absence of criminal antecedents, custody since 04.06.2025, and negligible risk of tampering or witness influence. No extraordinary circumstances justified continued detention. Bail was allowed subject to compliance with the conditions imposed by the HC.
HC granted regular bail to the Applicant, observing that he was arrested from his residence without prior service of summons or notice under s.41A CrPC or s.35 BNSS, and that the investigation against him is complete with the complaint already filed. The court applied established Apex Court principles for offences under s.132(1)(c),(f),(h) CGST Act, noting limited statutory maximum sentence, documentary nature of evidence, absence of criminal antecedents, custody since 04.06.2025, and negligible risk of tampering or witness influence. No extraordinary circumstances justified continued detention. Bail was allowed subject to compliance with the conditions imposed by the HC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
