Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Market value for captive electricity consumption follows industrial consumer tariffs, supporting profit computation for the power generation deduction...
The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging three Orders-in-Original concerning demands for allegedly fraudulent availment of ITC, holding that factual determinations on fraudulent ITC cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction and noting precedent from higher courts. The Court found non-entertainment of the writ appropriate and declined to interfere on merits for lack of natural justice issues warranting writ relief. The Petitioner was permitted to challenge each O-O by filing statutory appeals; any amounts already deposited are to be adjusted against pre-deposits in those appeals. Petition disposed of.
The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging three Orders-in-Original concerning demands for allegedly fraudulent availment of ITC, holding that factual determinations on fraudulent ITC cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction and noting precedent from higher courts. The Court found non-entertainment of the writ appropriate and declined to interfere on merits for lack of natural justice issues warranting writ relief. The Petitioner was permitted to challenge each O-O by filing statutory appeals; any amounts already deposited are to be adjusted against pre-deposits in those appeals. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
