Reassessment under s.148A held valid; s.69 additions totaling Rs.7,00,000 deleted after acceptable contemporaneous explanations for property investmen...
Adjudication set aside; Rule 9 valuation based on internet engineer report quashed for Rule 3(4) non-compliance; Section 138B cross-examination requir...
The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging three Orders-in-Original concerning demands for allegedly fraudulent availment of ITC, holding that factual determinations on fraudulent ITC cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction and noting precedent from higher courts. The Court found non-entertainment of the writ appropriate and declined to interfere on merits for lack of natural justice issues warranting writ relief. The Petitioner was permitted to challenge each O-O by filing statutory appeals; any amounts already deposited are to be adjusted against pre-deposits in those appeals. Petition disposed of.
The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging three Orders-in-Original concerning demands for allegedly fraudulent availment of ITC, holding that factual determinations on fraudulent ITC cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction and noting precedent from higher courts. The Court found non-entertainment of the writ appropriate and declined to interfere on merits for lack of natural justice issues warranting writ relief. The Petitioner was permitted to challenge each O-O by filing statutory appeals; any amounts already deposited are to be adjusted against pre-deposits in those appeals. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
