Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging three Orders-in-Original concerning demands for allegedly fraudulent availment of ITC, holding that factual determinations on fraudulent ITC cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction and noting precedent from higher courts. The Court found non-entertainment of the writ appropriate and declined to interfere on merits for lack of natural justice issues warranting writ relief. The Petitioner was permitted to challenge each O-O by filing statutory appeals; any amounts already deposited are to be adjusted against pre-deposits in those appeals. Petition disposed of.
The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging three Orders-in-Original concerning demands for allegedly fraudulent availment of ITC, holding that factual determinations on fraudulent ITC cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction and noting precedent from higher courts. The Court found non-entertainment of the writ appropriate and declined to interfere on merits for lack of natural justice issues warranting writ relief. The Petitioner was permitted to challenge each O-O by filing statutory appeals; any amounts already deposited are to be adjusted against pre-deposits in those appeals. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.