Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9981 to 10000 of 96504 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed that the narrower construction urged by the assessee is untenable and that payments made under a specified agreement involving transfer of leasehold development rights fall within the ambit of s.194IC, thereby attracting TDS and consequential liability under s.201(1)/(1A). The Tribunal rejected the contention that the transferor was outside the definition of "specified agreement" and held the beneficial intent of sub-s.5A favours treating such transfers as taxable. The Tribunal found no evidence that the transferor had offered the impugned receipts to tax and remitted the matter to the AO to verify whether the transferor declared the payments in AY 2024-25; appeal otherwise dismissed.
ITAT affirmed that the narrower construction urged by the assessee is untenable and that payments made under a specified agreement involving transfer of leasehold development rights fall within the ambit of s.194IC, thereby attracting TDS and consequential liability under s.201(1)/(1A). The Tribunal rejected the contention that the transferor was outside the definition of "specified agreement" and held the beneficial intent of sub-s.5A favours treating such transfers as taxable. The Tribunal found no evidence that the transferor had offered the impugned receipts to tax and remitted the matter to the AO to verify whether the transferor declared the payments in AY 2024-25; appeal otherwise dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
