Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
ITAT allowed Ground No.2, holding that Company A is not a comparable for TP adjustment. The Tribunal accepted that Company A admitted to ROC it is exclusively a manufacturer, whereas the assessee conducts both manufacturing and trading; the TPO's 75% trading-turnover filter consequently excluded Company A. On this basis the AO/TPO is directed to delete Company A from the selected comparable set. The parties conceded that Company B's operating margin is 2.92%; accordingly the AO/TPO is directed to re-compute the comparable average and TP result incorporating Company B at a 2.92% margin.
ITAT allowed Ground No.2, holding that Company A is not a comparable for TP adjustment. The Tribunal accepted that Company A admitted to ROC it is exclusively a manufacturer, whereas the assessee conducts both manufacturing and trading; the TPO's 75% trading-turnover filter consequently excluded Company A. On this basis the AO/TPO is directed to delete Company A from the selected comparable set. The parties conceded that Company B's operating margin is 2.92%; accordingly the AO/TPO is directed to re-compute the comparable average and TP result incorporating Company B at a 2.92% margin.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
